Kremlin
tightens grip after regional elections
By
Nick Coleman
AFP
MOSCOW
Petroleumworld.com
03 13 07
Parties loyal to President Vladimir Putin steamrolled regional elections,
provisional results showed Monday, confirming the Kremlin's grip on
power ahead of parliamentary and presidential polls.
The pro-Kremlin United Russia party secured commanding leads in 13
out of 14 races. The 14th region, Stavropol, went to another pro-Kremlin
party, A Just Russia, according to preliminary results.
The polls, in which 31 million people or about a third of the electorate,
were eligible to vote, were seen as setting the stage for nationwide
parliamentary elections in December.
The December polls will in turn form the backdrop to the presidential
vote to confirm a successor to Putin next March.
But
critics dismissed the polls as being wholly undemocratic.
"The election process overall has become meaningless in its present
form," the Gazeta daily concluded.
"The amount of falsification, black PR, open criminality, pressure
and threats to opponents was simply too great," Gazeta said.
Average voter turnout was 39.14 percent, election commission head
Alexander Veshnyakov said.
Preliminary results showed that one liberal opposition party, the
Union of Right Forces, managed to cross the seven-percent threshold
needed to qualify for seats in five of the regions, the election commission
said.
The bar was recently raised, excluding all but the most powerful parties
from winning seats in the proportional representation system.
The veteran liberal party Yabloko looked set to fail in all 14 regions.
It had already been excluded from races in a potential stronghold
Saint Petersburg on a technicality, which it disputed unsuccessfully.
But the main intrigue was the acrimonious battle between the two pro-Kremlin
parties, as well as numerous allegations of violations.
Sergei Mironov, head of A Just Russia and also speaker of the upper
house of parliament, alleged dirty tricks were used to steal votes
from his party.
In
regions where "we have a very good position and expected a reasonable
result, there were the most violations by our opponents," said
Mironov.
Newspapers reported an election-related shooting in which one person
was injured in the unstable southern province of Dagestan, while in
Saint Petersburg, an election candidate was seriously injured in a
stabbing.
The vote looked likely to confirm criticism by Western governments
and opposition groups that the Kremlin has reined in the democratisation
that took place after the Soviet Union's 1991 collapse, particularly
by quashing independent media.
Boris Kagarlitsky of the Moscow-based Institute for Globalisation
and Social Movements, said Sunday's vote confirmed that future races
would be a struggle among elites, with little input from the population
at large.
He pointed to the men widely seen as likely contenders to succeed
Putin, the two deputy prime ministers Sergei Ivanov and Dmitry Medvedev.
While the two might try to join forces with one or another party,
even attract opposition support "they're not selected by any
real democratic process," Kagarlitsky said.
Sunday's
vote, Kagarlitsky said, "is a perfect oligarchic contest. The
contest is real and more or less fair but it's an oligarchic contest.
It has nothing to do with people's interests, with democracy, as everyone
is excluded."
Analysts also noted the relatively low turnout at the election. But
that will not influence the results, as the minimum turnout threshold
has been abolished. Also abolished was the "vote-against-all"
option.
Andrei Piontkovsky, director of the Institute of Political Studies,
stressed that the "turn-out is very low, even in the politicised
Moscow region."
While Russia is enjoying growing oil wealth, "the voters have
been made passive," he said.
"The election has shown that the people are not a problem. The
only problem is the transition period. The struggles for the seat
of power," Piontkovsky said.
Last Friday, the Kommersant newspaper published an interview with
former presidential candidate Sergei Glazyev saying he was leaving
politics due to the unprecedented concentration of political power
in the Kremlin.
"Politics in the country today is decided by one person. Even
under the tsars the concentration of power was less as they had to
take notice of the church. Today even that doesn't happen," Glazyev
said.
AFP
12 1235 GMT 03 07
Copyright© 2007 AFP. All
Rights Reserved.