World

 

Bolivia

Peru

Venezuela

Trinidad
&
Caribbean

 








Very usefull links



 


Sudan shrugs off US 'genocide' sanctions as political




By Mohamed Hasni
AFP
KHARTOUM
Petroleumworld.com 05 31 07

Sudanese officials and analysts on Wednesday dismissed new US sanctions over what Washington termed Khartoum's genocide in Darfur as being a largely political exercise rather than harsh economic curbs.

While one official said economic sanctions could hurt in the long term, but that his country was counting on its "friends" to avert this, notably China, which takes 60 percent of its oil exports.

"I am sure that the companies targeted (by Washington) have long put alternatives in place" to minimise this kind of sanction, said Mohammed Mahjub Harun, a member of Sudan's institute of strategic studies.

He and other analysts questioned by AFP saw the sanctions announced on Tuesday by US President George W. Bush as a means of pressing Khartoum into accepting an international peacekeeping force for Sudan's western region of Darfur.

The United Nations says 200,000 people have been killed there and two million made homeless since rebellion broke out four years ago. That drew a harsh crackdown by Sudan's army and its feared Arab Janjaweed militia allies, which has been blamed for widespread murder, rape and burning of villages.

Sudan disputes those estimates, saying 9,000 people have died.

"This is only a reinforcement of sanctions that have existed for 10 years and have not prevented the Sudanese economy from developing thanks to close links formed with Asia," said Harun.

The stricter sanctions will bar another 31 companies, including oil exporters, from US trade and financial dealings, and take aim at two top Sudanese government officials, the Treasury Department said.

Bush said he had directed US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to seek a new UN resolution to broaden economic sanctions on Sudan's leaders, expand an arms embargo on Sudan and bar Sudanese military flights over Darfur.

China, is not only a major customer for Sudanese oil but also supplies arms to the country, opposed the latest sanctions.

Liu Guijin, Beijing's special representative on Darfur, said the sanctions would "only make achieving a solution more complicated," but stopped short of saying China would use its veto power to block a new UN resolution.

Hassen Mekki, a political science lecturer, pointed out that the latest sanctions exclude some Sudanese companies that trade with the United States, such as those which produce Arabic gum used in making the soda drinks manufactured by giant American companies.

Harun said the impact of the sanctions in general could be gauged by the fact that "there has not been a single street demonstration."

But Ahmed Sharif Osman, another analyst, said the sanctions would have an impact, albeit limited. "This impact will be measured in the volume of financial transactions going through the American system."

US official say the goal of the sanctions is to force Sudan to allow the full deployment of a UN peacekeeping force, disarm the Janjaweed militias blamed for much of the carnage, and let humanitarian aid reach the region.

In Khartoum, presidential adviser Mazjub al-Khalifa told reporters the decision "highlights the hostile intentions and points to the fact that the United States does not want peace in Darfur."

Sudan's UN envoy Abdalmahmood Abdalhaleem Mohammad called Bush's moves "very regrettable" coming just when he said Khartoum was cooperating with the United Nations on joint peacekeeping with the African Union in Darfur. The world body is seeking a combined force of some 20,000 peace-keepers.

Harun said Washington was trying to push European countries into following its lead and could well succeed "because in all cases, the countries of Europe have few trade links with Sudan."

" But it is unlikely that China will do the same (as Washington)," he added.

AFP 30 1248 GMT 05 07

Copyright© 2007 AFP. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

Send this story to a friend

Your feedback is important to us!

We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.

Write to editor@petroleumworld.com

Any question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com





Best Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels

 

   
S


Contact:
editor@petroleumworld.com/phones:(58 412) 996 3730 or 952 5301
www.petroleumworld.com-Editor:Elio Ohep /
Publisher-Producer:Elio Ohep.
Contact Email:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Legal Information. CopyRight © 2002, Elio Ohep.- All rights reserved

This site is a public free site and it contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of business, environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have chosen to view the included information for research, information, and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission fromPetroleumworld or the copyright owner of the material.