Venezuela:
Chevron is keeping the door open
By
Kristen Hays
Houston
Chronicle
HOUSTON
Petroleumworld.com
06 28 07
Chevron Corp. is the last U.S. oil major standing in Venezuela's
resource-rich Orinoco River basin after Exxon Mobil Corp. and ConocoPhillips
this week refused to capitulate to new working terms imposed by Venezuela's
government-controlled oil company.
While Chevron gave up operating an oil production pro- ject like
its peers, the company retained its 30 percent interest in the Hamaca
project.
The San Ramon, Calif., company's continued presence also maintains
access to its significant natural gas plays elsewhere in Venezuela,
which experts say is likely enough incentive to give in on the Orinoco.
"They are relatively minor in the Orinoco, but they are a big
player in the gas sector," said Patrick Esteruelas, an analyst
with political risk consultancy Eurasia Group. "Not to play
ball on one side of the business is to shut down all other opportunities
in the country."
Chevron spokesman
Leif Sollid said Wednesday that its negotiations with Petróleos de Venezuela, or PDVSA, were acceptable, and "we
look forward to continuing our long-standing partnership with Venezuela
and the Hamaca project's success."
While PDVSA took over operating Orinoco projects in May, Tuesday
was the deadline for foreign companies to sign agreements that outlined
their lesser roles. Exxon Mobil and ConocoPhillips refused to sign,
while Chevron, Total, BP and Statoil, Norway's state-controlled oil
company, stayed.
The takeovers stemmed from a decree issued earlier this year by
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, a vocal critic of both the Bush
administration and previous contracts that allowed foreign companies
to control projects in the oil-rich nation.
Chavez's administration has used PDVSA as a cash cow for its social
welfare programs and critics say the oil company has failed to invest
enough money in new oil ventures, causing its output to drop in recent
years.
In addition,
concerns persist about the quality of expertise of its managers
and laborers after 19,000 workers — about half
of the company — were fired following a 2002-2003 strike aimed
at bringing down the Chavez regime.
As a result,
Exxon Mobil and ConocoPhillips "probably feel
pretty uncomfortable about PDVSA being in charge," said Enrique
Sira, an analyst with Cambridge Energy Research Associates.
Talks on compensation
Exxon Mobil and ConocoPhillips remain in negotiations with PDVSA
on compensation for what they are giving up. For Exxon Mobil, that's
a 41.7 percent stake in Cerro Negro. BP retained its 16 percent interest
in Cerro Negro, while PDVSA swallowed Exxon Mobil's stake.
PDVSA also absorbed
ConocoPhillips's stakes in its projects — 40
percent in Hamaca, 50.1 percent in Petrozuata, and 32.5 percent in
Corocoro, an offshore operation slated to begin production next year.
Total's 47 percent interest in its Sincor project fell to 30.3 percent,
while Statoil's stake fell to 9.7 percent from 15 percent. PDVSA
now holds the rest.
Corporate bond
research firm Gimme Credit called the situation a "prisoner's
dilemma" in a note to investors Wednesday.
"Near term, going with the flow netted Chevron more than ConocoPhillips
by hanging tough — Chevron still has access to Venezuelan oil," it
said.
Who will win?
" On another level, however, it remains to be seen whether or not the
result will be advantageous for Venezuela. The country still has
to compensate the oil companies leaving, and is left with partners
that, while credible, won't necessarily make the projects their highest
priority."
Chevron has a 39 percent stake in Petroboscan, an onshore oil field
near Lake Maracaibo. And the company's natural gas discoveries off
Venezuela's northeast shore are under consideration to supply natural
gas to Venezuela, Sollid said.
Total has interests in onshore and offshore Venezuelan natural gas
fields. And John Parry, an analyst with John S. Herold, noted BP's
natural gas interests in neighboring Trinidad likely played a part
in its decision to stay in Venezuela as well.
"I suspect this is a move that somebody stays inside the gate
and somebody works it from outside the gate," he said of Exxon
Mobil and ConocoPhillips' decision to exit while the others — including
their former partners — are staying. "Someone had to stay
in the muck and someone had to get out of it."
-
kristen.hays@chron.com
Houston
Chronicle 28
06 07
Copyright© 2007
Houston
Chronicle . All
Rights Reserved.