Greenhouse
gas and war: How they are related
PARIS
Petroleumworld.com
10 15 07
How can the Nobel Peace Prize -- intended for those
who labour for "fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction
of standing armies and for the holding of peace congresses" -- be awarded
for work on climate change?
Skeptics were swift to raise this question after the planet's most prestigious
award went to former US president Al Gore for his campaigning on global warming
and the scientists of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
Among them was Czech President Vaclav Klaus, who derides global warming as a
green scare.
Klaus "is a bit surprised that Al Gore has received a peace prize, because
the connection between his activities and world peace are vague and not very
clear," his office said icily on Friday.
Many experts, though, feel no surprise at all.
They see an unmistakeable link between carbon pollution and future bloodshed,
and welcome efforts to place the spotlight on this largely hidden threat.
"Climate change is one of the most significant issues of our times and one
which has major implications for global security as well as our personal health,
wealth and well-being," said Martin Taylor, vice president of the Royal
Society, Britain's de-facto academy of sciences.
"There is already evidence that climate change is having an impact on access
to adequate food and clean water in some areas of the world, potentially increasing
the risk of conflict between peoples and nations."
The thinking is this: if greenhouse-gas emissions are unchecked, they could so
damage Earth's climate system that fragile economies could be pushed over the
edge through crop failure, flooding, storm damage and rising seas.
Societies' faultlines could be ripped open by armies of environmental refugees,
and countries could be tempted to take the path of war as they grab rivers and
aquifers to ensure their population's survival.
Developing countries, especially those with delta mega-cities, are most vulnerable
to climate impacts, the IPCC said earlier this year.
Jeffrey Sachs, director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University, New York,
cites the war in Sudan's Darfur as an example where climate change has already
driven a badly-stressed region over the brink.
"Darfur is a place that has had about one third of its usual precipitation
over the last 50 years, it's also had a big increase in population at the same
time, so it is being squeezed badly between falling water availability and rising
population," he told AFP in an interview.
"We're going to see a lot of that in the future, because there are a lot
of poor, fragile, conflict-ridden or conflict-prone areas, especially in the
drylands, that are likely to be in the line of fire, as it were, of climate change."
Potential flashpoints are regions that are already water-stressed and highly
populated, and where aridity is likely to worsen as a result of rising temperatures,
says Sachs, naming the Middle East, South and Southeast Asia and the drylands
of East Africa and Central Asia.
According to a US State Department report in June, more than a billion people
in Asia could face reduced water availability by mid-century.
The Stern Review, a 2006 assessment on the economics of climate change authored
by British economist Sir Nicholas Stern, quoted estimates of as many as 150-200
million "permanently displaced" environmental refugees by mid-century.
Britain's International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) warned last month
that fears about stability -- once hidden by smoke from the debate over the scientific
evidence for global warming -- are bound to rise to the top of the agenda.
"The security dimension will come increasingly to the forefront as countries
begin to see falls in available resources and economic vitality, increased stress
on their armed forces, greater instability in regions of strategic import, increases
in ethnic rivalries, and a widening gap between rich and poor," it said.
Former US ambassador to China Joseph Prueher, a retired US admiral, believes
that the poverty and turmoil that derive from climate-related disasters will
provide fertile
ground for terrorism.
"Climate change poses a serious threat to America's national security," said
Prueher in testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in May.
"Climate change will exacerbate many of the causes of instability that exist
today -- those instabilities are part of the underpinnings of extremism."
He called on the US military to start planning now for a new era of environmentally-spawned
security threats, to help mitigate some of the worst impact.
k
Story
by Richard
Ingham from AFP
AFP
140119 GMT 10 07
Copyright© 2007
Petroleumworld.
All rights reserved.