En Español

Very usefull links


News links




Dow Jones

Oil price



Views and News






Nidhi Verma and Neha Dasgupta -Indian Oil, partners look for cheaper site for Pacific NorthWest LNG terminal

Petroleumworld 08 04

Indian Oil Corp Ltd said it is in talks with its partners to scout for an alternative, cheaper site for the Pacific Northwest LNG terminal after the recent pullout of the lead developer cast doubt on the future of the Canadian project.

Malaysia's state-owned Petroliam Nasional Bhd (Petronas) , which held a majority 62 percent stake in the proposed C$36 billion ($29 billion) Pacific NorthWest LNG Project in British Columbia, said last week it was abandoning the plan due to weak global prices.

Sanjiv Singh, chairman of Indian Oil, which has a 10 percent stake in the Canadian project, said the company remained interest in going ahead with at least part of the plan.

"We are very much positive going ahead with the upstream part of it, which is gas production. Liquefaction and transportation further in the liquid form we are not pursuing, I mean, we don't want to pursue very aggressively as of now," he told a news conference.

"We are also looking at a different location which might be much less expensive than the earlier one," Singh said.

Indian Oil's head of business development, G.K. Satish, said consortium partners are talking about alternatives. He declined to comment on write-offs IOC might be taking in the next quarter for investment in the Canadian LNG project.

Petronas's pullout dealt a blow to the project and its partners which would now have to invest additional capital to complete the project.

Indian Oil is the first partner to suggest the project could still go ahead, in modified form.

"Cost of liquefaction, transportation and retail outside Canada has gone up. And today we are finding that it may not be very attractive at the present prices," Singh said.

The other partners in the project are Chinese oil and gas giant Sinopec, with 15 percent, Japex Montney Ltd, with 10 percent, and Petroleum Brunei, with 3 percent.

Petronas may have to write off up to $800 million for work already done on the Canadian project, analysts say.

Japan Petroleum Exploration Co (Japex) said on Wednesday it would take a loss of about C$102 million ($82 million) due to the scrapping of the project.

Indian Oil Corp planned to lift 1.2 million tonnes of the super-cooled fuel for 20 years from the British Columbia project for its 5 million tonne a year regasification LNG plant at Ennore in eastern India. Indian Oil was expecting deliveries from the western Canadian project to begin in 2020.

The company said it also expected a "slight delay" from Cameron LNG project in the United States and will see deliveries by the end of 2018.

Indian Oil will float a tender to import 2 million barrels of high sulphur U.S. crude in August. It intends to import high sulphur oil from the United States for as long as benchmark WTI prices are depressed, Finance Director A.K. Sharma said.

The company's net profit fell 45 percent in its fiscal first quarter of 2017, beating analysts' estimates, although higher inventory losses and lower refining margins weighed on profitability.

Net profit was 45.49 billion rupees ($714.83 million) in the quarter ended on June 30, compared with 82.69 billion rupees a year earlier, the country's top refiner said. ( bit.ly/2v21dfw )

Analysts on average had expected a net profit of 30.63 billion rupees for the first quarter, Thomson Reuters data showed.

India's top refiner suffered an inventory loss - due to sudden changes in oil and refined product prices - of 40.4 billion rupees in the June quarter compared to a gain of 74.8 billion rupees a year ago, Sharma said.

The company's quarterly average gross refining margins, or profit earned on each barrel of crude processed, fell to $4.32 per barrel, compared with $9.98 per barrel in the same period last year.

IOC's shares closed 4.6 percent up and was the top percentage gainer on the broader Nifty 50 index.

$1 = 63.6375 Indian rupees

Reporting by Nidhi Verma and Neha Dasgupta in New Delhi and Aby Jose Koilparambil in Bengaluru; Editing by Christian Schmollinger and Adrian Croft r from Reuters.

08 03 2017

We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.

Write to editor@petroleumworld.com

By using this link, you agree to allow PW
to publish your comments on our letters page.

Any question or suggestions,
please write to: editor@petroleumworld.com

Best Viewed with IE 5.01+ Windows NT 4.0, '95,
'98,ME,XP, Vista, Windows 7,8,10 +/ 800x600 pixels

Round 2.2 & 2.3










Contact: editor@petroleumworld.com,

Editor & Publisher:Elio Ohep/
Contact Email: editor@petroleumworld.com

CopyRight © 1999-2016, Paul Ohep F. - All Rights Reserved. Legal Information

PW in Top 100 Energy Sites

CopyRight©1999-2017, Petroleumworld   / Elio Ohep - All rights reservedThis site is a public free site and it contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of business, environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have chosen to view the included information for research, information, and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission fromPetroleumworld or the copyright owner of the material.