OPEC math with a gap between headlines and real barrels
Many countries won't be able to fulfill any increase in quotas.
Real boost likely to be a third less than headline number.
- Play video - OPEC May Hold One of The Most Political Meetings in Years, Sen Says.
Javier Blas and Jack Farchy
Petroleumworld 06 20 2018
When OPEC meets on Friday in Vienna to discuss a possible output hike in the second half of the year, there's likely to be a significant gap between the headline numbers under discussion and the amount of oil that can actually be added to the market.
The gap between real barrels and those that exist only on paper means that the impact on the market of any agreement between the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies to increase supply is likely to be about one-third smaller than the headline announcement, according to Bloomberg calculations.
To see why, look at the 1.5 million-barrel-a-day increase that has been floated by Russian Energy Minister Alexander Novak. He said on Tuesday that his proposal would allocate the quota increase among all OPEC+ members in proportion to the original cuts each country agreed back in 2016.
That would give Saudi Arabia a 402,000-barrel increase, Russia a 248,000-barrel hike, and so forth. But it would also allot higher quotas to countries which are probably, or certainly, unable to lift output -- such as Venezuela, Mexico and Angola.
Of the 1.5 million-barrel-a-day increase, only 958,000 barrels would go to producers that are almost certainly able to use them. The same logic applies to smaller quota adjustments. A 1 million barrel-a-day boost would actually hand only 639,000 barrels of increased quotas to countries that could definitely use them.
"Because so many OPEC countries can't increase production, the real output boost will be substantially lower than the headline announcement," said Amrita Sen, Chief Oil Analyst at consultant Energy Aspects Ltd.
Hit your target - Advertise with Us
Story by Javier Blas and Jack Farchy from Bloomberg.
bloomberg.com 06 20 2018
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write to email@example.com
By using this link, you agree to allow PW
to publish your comments on our letters page.
Any question or suggestions,
please write to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Best Viewed with IE 5.01+ Windows NT 4.0, '95,
'98,ME,XP, Vista, Windows 7,8,10 +/ 800x600 pixels