Very usefull links


News links




Dow Jones

Oil price



Views and News






U.S. energy exports to China downhill as Trump trade war bites - Russell





By Clyde Russell

Petroleumworld 10 18 2018

It's probably not the kind of success U.S. President Donald Trump had in mind, but his trade dispute with China has effectively killed off the burgeoning energy trade between the world's two biggest economies.

China's imports of U.S. crude oil, liquefied natural gas (LNG) and coal have slowed to a trickle amid the escalating tit-for-tat tariff war.


Perhaps the irony of the collapse in China's energy imports from the United States was that this was the area most likely to deliver Trump's much-sought lowering of the trade deficit between the pair.

If China had continued to buy increasing volumes of U.S. crude, LNG and coal, this would have been far more effective at lowering the trade deficit than Trump's chosen path of imposing tariffs on $200 billion of imports from China.

Crude oil imports from the United States are expected to have dropped to zero in October, according to vessel-tracking and port data compiled by Refinitiv.

This is despite crude oil not being on the list of $60 billion of imports from the United States that China has now subjected to tariffs.

A single cargo of 1 million barrels of crude is headed to China from the U.S. Gulf coast, and is scheduled to arrive in November, according to the ship-tracking data.

China's imports of U.S. crude peaked in June this year, when almost 14 million barrels, or about 466,000 barrels per day (bpd), arrived.

In the first nine months of this year, China imported about 328,000 bpd from the United States, representing about 3.6 percent of its total crude imports.

Similar to crude, no U.S. cargoes of LNG are scheduled to arrive in China in October, although one vessel from the Sabine Pass LNG facility in Louisiana is slated to arrive in November.

In the first nine months of the year, 31 ships delivered a total of 2.2 million tonnes of LNG from the United States to China, representing about 6 percent of total imports, according to the vessel-tracking data.

Exports to China were about 13 percent of total U.S. shipments of LNG in the first nine months of the year.

As the trade dispute with China escalated, U.S LNG exports appear to have slipped, with the 1.58 million tonnes shipped in September and the 1.57 million tonnes in August being the two weakest months this year behind April's 1.33 million tonnes.


Turning to coal, it's largely the same story as for crude and LNG, with U.S. exports to China plummeting after growing strongly over the past two years.

No U.S. coal is scheduled to arrive in China this month, although three ships are due in November, with one of the cargoes being petcoke, according to the vessel-tracking data.

U.S. coal exports to China have mainly been higher-quality coking coal used in steel-making, although a number of ships carrying thermal coal used in power stations have been tracked this year.

China imported 3.2 million tonnes of U.S. coal in the first nine months of the year, representing just 1.7 percent of the country's total imports, but a somewhat larger 3.9 percent share of U.S. exports.

In all three energy products, China is a bigger share of U.S. exports than the United States is of Chinese imports.

This suggests that China may well find it easier to source alternative supplies than U.S. producers will find other buyers.

The speed at which U.S. energy exports to China have gone from hero to zero may also be surprising, especially since the tariffs on coal and LNG were only recently imposed, and crude is still tariff-free.

This may make it tempting to think that China will be able to rapidly ramp up imports of U.S. energy should the trade dispute be resolved.

But the risk for U.S. energy exporters is that markets, once lost, are difficult to recover, especially if your customer has readily available alternative sources of supply.



Story by John Kemp from Reuters. 17 11 2018



We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.


Write to

By using this link, you agree to allow PW
to publish your comments on our letters page.

Any question or suggestions,
please write to:

Best Viewed with IE 5.01+ Windows NT 4.0, '95,
'98,ME,XP, Vista, Windows 7,8,10 +/ 800x600 pixels

Twitter: @petroleumworld1

November 13 - 15, 2018.

Gubkin University, Moscow
SPE Student Chapter










Editor & Publisher:Elio Ohep/
Contact Email:

CopyRight © 1999-2016, Paul Ohep F. - All Rights Reserved. Legal Information

PW in Top 100 Energy Sites

CopyRight©1999-2017, Petroleumworld   / Elio Ohep - All rights reservedThis site is a public free site and it contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of business, environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have chosen to view the included information for research, information, and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission fromPetroleumworld or the copyright owner of the material.