Mexico



Very usefull links



PW
Bookstore




 

 


News links

AP

AFP

Aljazeera

Dow Jones

Oil price

Reuters

Bloomberg

Views and News
from
Norway

 

 

 

 

Oil Thursday tallies a two session decline of more than 4%

By Mayra P. Saefong

SAN FRANCISCO
Petroleumworld 10 182018

Oil futures fell sharply Thursday to tally a drop of more than 4% in two sessions, as a fourth straight weekly climb in U.S. crude inventories helped ease concerns over tight global supplies, with the U.S. set to impose sanctions on Iranian oil next month.

Natural-gas prices, meanwhile, dropped almost 4% after data from the Energy Information Administration on Thursday revealed a weekly rise that generally met market expectations, but also showed that total supplies of the fuel in storage climbed to their highest level since late 2017.

November futures on the U.S. benchmark, West Texas intermediate crude CLX8, +0.19% fell $1.10, or 1.6%, to settle at $68.65 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange, tallying a two-session loss of more than 4%. That was also the lowest finish for a front-month contract since Sept. 13. The global benchmark December Brent crude LCOZ8, -0.87% declined 76 cents, or nearly 1%, to $79.29 a barrel, on the ICE Futures Europe exchange, the lowest settlement since Sept. 21.

Among the products traded on Nymex, November gasoline RBX8, -0.06%  fell 1.4% to $1.891 a gallon, while November heating oil HOX8, +0.26%  lost 0.7% at $2.295 a gallon.

Oil also fell sharply Wednesday after the EIA reported a 6.5 million barrel rise in domestic crude inventories in the week ended Oct. 12, far larger than expected and the fourth consecutive weekly increase.

“The rise in inventories continues a recent trend that is signaling that supply is not an issue,” Brian Youngberg, senior energy analyst at Edward Jones, told MarketWatch.

A fall in crude exports led to an increase in net imports, boosting inventories despite a fall in production in the Gulf of Mexico due to Hurricane Michael.

“Concerns over U.S.-Saudi relations have had no material impact,” Youngberg said. “The thought that the impact from Iran sanctions will just be offset by production elsewhere is also causing bulls to retrench a bit.”

Read: Here's why oil isn't rallying despite U.S.-Saudi tensions over missing journalist

Analysts at Vienna-based consulting firm JBC Energy said the hit to global supply from Iran sanctions has already been largely factored into prices.

“Satellite ship-tracking services indicate that Turkey is the only regular European buyer of Iranian crude left, implying that EU refiners have already successfully reshuffled some 500,000 [barrels a day] of crude imports away from Iranian crude,” they wrote, adding that a deep discount for Urals NWE crude versus Brent indicates there is no particular shortage of medium-sour crude in Europe.

If Iranian crude exports stabilize at 900,000 barrels a day, it would make for a strong case that the peak bullish impact of the Iran sanctions has passed, potentially depriving the market “of a major pillar of support at a time when the demand and refining pillars are already teetering,” they said.

On the other side, Eugen Weinberg, head of commodity research at Commerzbank, said it appeared that hopes the shortfall in Iran exports would be offset by a resumption of oil output in the so-called neutral zone between Saudi Arabia and Kuwait “appeared to be coming to nothing.”

The neutral zone is a 2,230 square-mile area between the borders of the two countries that's been left undefined since the border was established in 1922. S&P Global Platts reported earlier this week that talks between the two countries over two shared oil fields have broken down, shutting in around 500,000 barrels a day of anticipated oil production.

“Efforts to achieve this have failed for now,” Weinberg said, in a Thursday note. “The market therefore risks seeing supply tighten until year's end, so we do not believe a Brent price below $80 is justified.”

The market has ‘already seen reduced exports from Iran, but increased production from the three largest producers, the U.S., Saudi Arabia and Russia.' Brian Youngberg, Edward Jones

Youngberg also pointed out that the market has “already seen reduced exports from Iran, but increased production from the three largest producers, the U.S., Saudi Arabia and Russia.” So while supply looks robust, “a bigger question…is how global demand is holding up. It appears it is, but it is something markets are watching in coming months.”

In other energy news Thursday, the EIA reported that domestic supplies of natural gas rose by 81 billion cubic feet for the week ended Oct. 12. Consensus estimates called for build near 85 billion, according to Schneider Electric. Total stocks now stand at 3.037 trillion cubic feet, the highest level since late December 2017, EIA data show.

November natural gas NGX18, +1.16%  lost 3.7% to finish at $3.198 per million British thermal units, slashing its week-to-date gain to 1.2%.

________________________

Story by Mayra P. Saefong from MarketWatch.

marketwatch.com
10 18 2018 19:30 GMT

We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.


Write to editor@petroleumworld.com



By using this link, you agree to allow PW
to publish your comments on our letters page.



Any question or suggestions,
please write to: editor@petroleumworld.com

Best Viewed with IE 5.01+ Windows NT 4.0, '95,
'98,ME,XP, Vista, Windows 7,8,10 +/ 800x600 pixels

Twitter: @petroleumworld1


November 13 - 15, 2018.

Gubkin University, Moscow
SPE Student Chapter

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOP

Contact: editor@petroleumworld.com,

Editor & Publisher:Elio Ohep/
Contact Email: editor@petroleumworld.com

CopyRight © 1999-2016, Paul Ohep F. - All Rights Reserved. Legal Information

PW in Top 100 Energy Sites

CopyRight©1999-2017, Petroleumworld ™  / Elio Ohep - All rights reservedThis site is a public free site and it contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of business, environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have chosen to view the included information for research, information, and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission fromPetroleumworld or the copyright owner of the material.