México

Guyana

Trinidad
& Tobago




Very usefull links



PW
Bookstore





News links

AP

AFP

Aljazeera

Dow Jones

Oil price

Reuters

Bloomberg

Views and News
from
Norway

 

 

 

US rethinks plan to freeze fuel economy

 


 

By Argus

WASHINGTON
Petroleumworld 01 17 2019

President Donald Trump's administration plans to adopt a 0.5pc/yr increase to fuel-economy standards for cars and pickups rather than freezing them through 2026, says a top Democratic lawmaker.

The US Senate Environment and Public Works Committee's ranking member Tom Carper (D-Delaware) said that rate increase would be 10 times weaker than existing fuel-economy targets that were set under former president Barack Obama. He predicted relaxing the rules in such a way would produce years of litigation involving states, automakers and federal regulators.

"That is not a win-win outcome," Carper said today during a confirmation hearing for Andrew Wheeler to become the administrator of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). "It is a lose-lose."

The discussion comes as the Trump administration works to complete changes to the standards by the end of March, to provide time for automakers to adjust cars and trucks they will sell in model year 2021. The administration last year proposed to freeze fuel-economy standards starting next year at 37 miles/USG through 2026, which it expects will increase fuel consumption by 500,000 b/d.

EPA, which is developing the rule alongside the US Transportation Department, said no final decisions have been made. But the 0.5pc/yr increase would translate into fuel-economy targets for new cars and trucks rising by just 1.1 miles/USG over a seven-year period. That compares with an average increase of 9.7 miles/USG by 2026 under existing standards.

Democrats say relaxing the rules will increase greenhouse gas emissions, the country's reliance on oil and fuel costs for consumers. The administration expects freezing the standards will result in the emissions of 872mn metric tonnes of CO2 over the lifetimes of the vehicles, which is equivalent to about one-eighth of US greenhouse gas emissions.

"We import 2.5mn b/d from Opec," senator Ed Markey (D-Massachusetts) said. "Do you think that is just something we should accept by not increasing fuel-economy standards?"

Wheeler, who is now EPA's acting administrator, defended the administration's approach. He said the regulation would make new vehicles more affordable and reduce highway fatalities by 1,000/yr. That claim has been questioned by EPA's staff, which found freezing the standards would increase highway fatalities by 17/yr.

EPA said the partial government shutdown that is now in its 25th day has not had a "significant impact" on the schedule for finalizing the rule, which has been planned to be finalized by 30 March.

Republican lawmakers said they supported EPA's approach. Senator Jim Inhofe (R-Oklahoma) said the revised regulations would accommodate consumers who prefer buying trucks rather than smaller vehicles.

"Is it really the role of government to dictate what people are buying in America?" Inhofe said.

 


________________________


We invite you to join us as a sponsor.

Circulated Videos, Articles, Opinions and Reports which carry your name and brand are used to target Entrepreneurs through our site, promoting your organization’s services. The opportunity is to insert in our stories pages short attention-grabbing videos, or to publish your own feature stories.

 

________________________

 

 

Story from Argus Media

argusmedia.com 01 16 2019

Hit your target - Advertise with us

PW 300.000 plus request per week

Copyright© 1999-2019 Petroleumworld or respective author or news agency. All rights reserved.

We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ (PW) stories by anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source.

Other stories you have to get authorization by its authors. Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated.

Petroleumworld welcomes your feedback and comments, share your thoughts on this article, your feedback is important to us!

We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.

Write to editor@petroleumworld.com

By using this link, you agree to allow PW
to publish your comments on our letters page.

Any question or suggestions,
please write to: editor@petroleumworld.com

Best Viewed with IE 5.01+ Windows NT 4.0, '95,
'98,ME,XP, Vista, Windows 7,8,10 +/ 800x600 pixels

Twitter: @petroleumworld1


 

TOP

Contact: editor@petroleumworld.com,

Editor & Publisher: Elio Ohep/
Contact Email: editor@petroleumworld.com

CopyRight © 1999-2019, Paul Ohep F. - All Rights Reserved. Legal Information

PW in Top 100 Energy Sites

CopyRight©1999-2019, Petroleumworld   / Elio Ohep - All rights reservedThis site is a public free site and it contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of business, environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have chosen to view the included information for research, information, and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission fromPetroleumworld or the copyright owner of the material.