Bolivia

Venezuela

Trinidad
&
Caribbean

 








Very usefull links



 


Foreign oil producers put Arroyo on notice

AFP/FIle/Martin Bernetti

President of the Philippines, Gloria Macagapal-Arroyo's decision to revoke a contract awarded to a foreign company for oil production in the Philippines has sent a shudder through the heart of the foreign investment community. The president's executive order 556 effectively terminated Malaysian-based Mitra Energy Ltd's rights to take part in the development of oil deposits in the Camago-Malampaya field off western Palawan Island.

By Karl Wilson
AFP
MANILA
Petroleumworld.com 08 28 06

President Gloria Arroyo's decision to revoke a contract awarded to a foreign company for oil production in the Philippines has sent a shudder through the heart of the foreign investment community.

The president's executive order 556 effectively terminated Malaysian-based Mitra Energy Ltd's rights to take part in the development of oil deposits in the Camago-Malampaya field off western Palawan Island.

"Mitra won the tender fair and square and at the stroke of a pen it was taken away. There was no warning and no explanation," one industry source who declined to be named told AFP.

Oil exploration publication Upstream said the move was "understood to be due to pressure from influential Filipino business interests, which do not want the potentially lucrative projects to be awarded to a foreign company."

Mitra secured a preliminary agreement with a unit of Philippine National Oil Co (PNOC), PNOC Exploration Corp, which owns the Malampaya oil rights, on June 1 this year and the order was released on August 11 but backdated to June 17.

"It sounds like the abrogation of an agreement," said Peter Wallace, a consultant for foreign multinational corporations with over 30 years of experience in the Philippines.

He said investors were increasingly concerned about the "sanctity of contracts in this country", and there were unsubstantiated claims of one major foreign producer pulling out of a government deal since the Mitra order.

The order included a directive that bars PNOC and other government agencies from sub-contracting out work covering exploration, known as farm-in, or development, known as farm-out, in the Camago-Malampaya reservoir.

It said all arrangements entered into by the PNOC "which violate this Executive Order shall be immediately discontinued or cancelled."

The executive order also caught PNOC and the Department of Energy by surprise as neither knew anything about it, analysts told AFP. Both declined to comment on the issue.

And the unease was reflected by the French Chamber of Commerce, which wrote to trade and industry secretary Peter Favila, saying it would question the exclusion of PNOC and the Department of Energy from such a decision.

"We, the French Chamber of Commerce, are of the opinion that if indeed that was so, this occurrence would not help the establishment of confidence in the Philippine market which we have been trying to fight for."

Mitra spokesman Chris Whitmee told AFP: "We spent a great deal of time and upward of a million dollars preparing for this bid. Having it taken away from us without any explanation has taken us completely by surprise."

He said total project cost was estimated at about 700 million dollars with recoverable reserves forecast at between 35 and 40 million barrels to be financed by a unit of British Petroleum and Standard Chartered Bank.

Whitmee said his company had already lined up contracts with international vendors, with production due to begin towards the end of 2007.

"What we find particularly puzzling is the objection to farm-in, farm-out contracts. These are the energy sector's benchmark which all oil and gas companies use worldwide.

"Foreign governments and oil companies also use them to attract and obtain partners to join in either an exploration (farm-in) or development (farm-out) of a gas or oil field."

Such agreements, he said, had stood the test of time worldwide for over 50 years and majors like Shell did a farm-out of 45 percent of the Malampaya gas field to Chevron, as Shell did not want to take the whole risk alone.

He said to drill one oil well in Malampaya would cost more than 35 million dollars and Malampaya was not an easy area to drill as it sits at the bottom of 3,000 feet (1,000 metres) of water.

The size and costs were considered too small for the majors like Shell.

"The big players don't look at anything under 200 million barrels," Whitmee said, adding that with oil well above 60 dollars a barrel, the Malampaya site was economically viable and within Mitra's capabilities.

Whitmee said Mitra had not given up on the project and was waiting for an explanation, while others in the industry are waiting to see how the government justifies its decision to rescind a contract after it had been awarded.

"This is a tight-knit business," one industry source said. "When something like this happens, you have to think twice about investing here."

AFP 27 0234 GMT 08 06

Copyright ©Agence France Presse. All Rights Reserved.

 

Send this story to a friend

Your feedback is important to us!

We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.

Write to editor@petroleumworld.com

Any question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com





Best Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels

 

   


Contact:
editor@petroleumworld.com/phones:(58 412) 996 3730 or 952 5301
www.petroleumworld.com-Editor:Elio Ohep /
Publisher-Producer:Elio Ohep.
Contact Email:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Legal Information. CopyRight © 2002, Elio Ohep.- All rights reserved

This site is a public free site and it contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of business, environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have chosen to view the included information for research, information, and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission fromPetroleumworld or the copyright owner of the material.