| 
Bolivia
Venezuela
Trinidad
&
Caribbean










|
|
Foreign oil producers put Arroyo
on notice
AFP/FIle/Martin Bernetti
President of the Philippines, Gloria Macagapal-Arroyo's
decision to revoke a contract awarded to a foreign company for oil production
in the Philippines has sent a shudder through the heart of the foreign
investment community. The president's executive order 556 effectively
terminated Malaysian-based Mitra Energy Ltd's rights to take part in
the development of oil deposits in the Camago-Malampaya field off western
Palawan Island.
By
Karl Wilson
AFP
MANILA
Petroleumworld.com
08 28 06
President Gloria Arroyo's decision to revoke a contract awarded to a
foreign company for oil production in the Philippines has sent a shudder
through the heart of the foreign investment community.
The president's executive order 556 effectively terminated Malaysian-based
Mitra Energy Ltd's rights to take part in the development of oil deposits
in the Camago-Malampaya field off western Palawan Island.
"Mitra won the tender fair and square and at the stroke of a pen
it was taken away. There was no warning and no explanation," one
industry source who declined to be named told AFP.
Oil exploration publication Upstream said the move was "understood
to be due to pressure from influential Filipino business interests,
which do not want the potentially lucrative projects to be awarded to
a foreign company."
Mitra secured a preliminary agreement with a unit of Philippine National
Oil Co (PNOC), PNOC Exploration Corp, which owns the Malampaya oil rights,
on June 1 this year and the order was released on August 11 but backdated
to June 17.
"It sounds like the abrogation of an agreement," said Peter
Wallace, a consultant for foreign multinational corporations with over
30 years of experience in the Philippines.
He said investors were increasingly concerned about the "sanctity
of contracts in this country", and there were unsubstantiated claims
of one major foreign producer pulling out of a government deal since
the Mitra order.
The order included a directive that bars PNOC and other government agencies
from sub-contracting out work covering exploration, known as farm-in,
or development, known as farm-out, in the Camago-Malampaya reservoir.
It said all arrangements entered into by the PNOC "which violate
this Executive Order shall be immediately discontinued or cancelled."
The executive order also caught PNOC and the Department of Energy by
surprise as neither knew anything about it, analysts told AFP. Both
declined to comment on the issue.
And the unease was reflected by the French Chamber of Commerce, which
wrote to trade and industry secretary Peter Favila, saying it would
question the exclusion of PNOC and the Department of Energy from such
a decision.
"We, the French Chamber of Commerce, are of the opinion that if
indeed that was so, this occurrence would not help the establishment
of confidence in the Philippine market which we have been trying to
fight for."
Mitra spokesman Chris Whitmee told AFP: "We spent a great deal
of time and upward of a million dollars preparing for this bid. Having
it taken away from us without any explanation has taken us completely
by surprise."
He said total project cost was estimated at about 700 million dollars
with recoverable reserves forecast at between 35 and 40 million barrels
to be financed by a unit of British Petroleum and Standard Chartered
Bank.
Whitmee said his company had already lined up contracts with international
vendors, with production due to begin towards the end of 2007.
"What we find particularly puzzling is the objection to farm-in,
farm-out contracts. These are the energy sector's benchmark which all
oil and gas companies use worldwide.
"Foreign governments and oil companies also use them to attract
and obtain partners to join in either an exploration (farm-in) or development
(farm-out) of a gas or oil field."
Such agreements, he said, had stood the test of time worldwide for over
50 years and majors like Shell did a farm-out of 45 percent of the Malampaya
gas field to Chevron, as Shell did not want to take the whole risk alone.
He said to drill one oil well in Malampaya would cost more than 35 million
dollars and Malampaya was not an easy area to drill as it sits at the
bottom of 3,000 feet (1,000 metres) of water.
The size and costs were considered too small for the majors like Shell.
"The big players don't look at anything under 200 million barrels,"
Whitmee said, adding that with oil well above 60 dollars a barrel, the
Malampaya site was economically viable and within Mitra's capabilities.
Whitmee said Mitra had not given up on the project and was waiting for
an explanation, while others in the industry are waiting to see how
the government justifies its decision to rescind a contract after it
had been awarded.
"This is a tight-knit business," one industry source said.
"When something like this happens, you have to think twice about
investing here."
AFP
27 0234 GMT 08 06
Copyright
©Agence
France Presse.
All Rights Reserved.
Send
this story to a friend
Your
feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write
to editor@petroleumworld.com
Any
question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Best
Viewed with IE
5.01+
Windows
NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels
|
| |
|