World

 

Bolivia

Peru

Venezuela

Trinidad
&
Caribbean

 








Very usefull links



 

 

 

 

 



Guyana wins maritime boundary arbitration
to Surinam paving way for oil exploration





Petroleumworld
CARACAS
Petroleumworld.com 09 21 07

A unanimous decision by Law of the Sea Arbitral Tribunal ends longstanding maritime boundary dispute, paving way for underwater hydrocarbons exploration and drilling by both countries, Guyana and Suriname, Foley Hoag's legal firm representing Guyana informed in a press release.

In a decision that could set precedence for establishing international maritime boundaries, an arbitral tribunal has awarded the Republic of Guyana sovereignty over a nearly 13,000-square-mile swath of the Atlantic Ocean that had also been claimed by its neighbor, Suriname.

Guyana's lead counsel, Paul Reichler, a partner in the Washington office of law firm Foley Hoag LLP, says the ruling, which comes three and a half years after Guyana initially filed for arbitration, fortifies the role of international tribunals in adjudicating sovereignty disputes. According to Mr. Reichler, arbitrated settlements of international boundaries are rare occurrences, despite the large number of disputed maritime boundaries around the world.

According to the terms of the tribunal's ruling, Guyana gains sovereignty of some 12,837-square miles of the coastal waters; Suriname receives its own portion, of approximately 6,900 square miles.

" This is a hugely important win, not only in upholding Guyana's claims to its coastal waters, but in maintaining international law as a peaceful solution to resolving sovereign disputes," said Mr. Reichler. "The ruling could become an important model for settling other maritime delimitation conflicts, since the sad fact is that there are more disputed maritime claims around the world than there are settled maritime boundaries."

The formerly disputed waters, part of the Guyana Basin, are reportedly rich in oil and natural gas deposits. Both Guyana and Suriname agreed to abide by the tribunal's ruling, and as a result both nations can also now proceed in further exploration of their respective ocean territories.

Guyana and Suriname are located side by side on the northeastern coast of South America, between French Guyana and Venezuela. The exact position of the ocean boundary between them had long been a subject of disagreement, but did not erupt into real conflict until exploratory tests revealed potentially huge deposits beneath the sea bed. Suriname had asserted a boundary further to the north and west, while Guyana had relied on the more widely accepted "equidistance line" method of determining the boundary, which placed it further to the south and east. The result was a cone-shaped area of uncertain sovereignty with its apex at the mouth of the Corentyne River, which separates the two nations.

International law regards the first 12 miles of sea off a nation's coast to be its sovereign territory, no different from land. The next 188 miles are considered an Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), wherein the coastal nation enjoys sole rights to all ocean resources, although vessels from other nations may pass through.

In 2000 Guyana licensed CGX Energy, Inc., a Canadian oil and gas company, to operate a drilling rig within the disputed waters. In June 2000, a gunboat of the Suriname navy forced the oil rig workers to evacuate. Thereafter, international petroleum concerns were suspended in that part of the Guyana Basin, awaiting resolution of what seemed an increasingly intractable territorial disagreement.

Annex 7 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea provides for compulsory arbitration if one party to a dispute seeks it. In 2004, after a fruitless search for a negotiated settlement, Guyana filed for arbitration; as a fellow signatory of the Convention, Suriname had to accept. The case was heard by a panel of five experts in maritime law, at the seat of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, the Netherlands. Final arguments in December 2006 were held at the headquarters of the Organization of American States in Washington, DC.

Referencing Suriname's threatened military action against Guyana for exploring the waters, the 181-page tribunal ruling states, "Guyana now has undisputed title to the area where the incident occurred."

In addition to finding for Guyana regarding the boundary dispute, the arbitral tribunal found Suriname in breach of international law for resorting to the threat of violence against the CGX drilling rig.

In a speech broadcast nationally in Guyana on September 20, President Bharrat Jagdeo said, "The Award has taken Guyana's major arguments fully into account, and now allows our licensees to resume their petroleum exploration activities in the part of the sea that Guyana has claimed, in accordance with international law. The great achievement of the Award is to open up before Guyana and Suriname the prospect of practical harmonious cooperation in their economic development and in their relations as good neighbors."

Mr. Reichler specializes in representing nations before the International Court of Justice -- including, on separate occasions, Uruguay and Nicaragua -- and before international arbitral tribunals around the world. He is currently representing several other South American governments in territorial, maritime and environmental disputes.

Petroleumworld 20 09 07

Copyright© 2007 Petroleumworld. All rights reserved.

 

 

 

 

Send this story to a friend

Your feedback is important to us!

We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.

Write to editor@petroleumworld.com

Any question or suggestions, please write to:
editor@petroleumworld.com





Best Viewed with IE 5.01+
Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98 and ME +/ 800x600 pixels

 

   


Contact:
editor@petroleumworld.com/phones:(58 412) 996 3730 or 952 5301
www.petroleumworld.com-Editor:Elio Ohep /
Publisher-Producer:Elio Ohep.
Contact Email:
editor@petroleumworld.com
Legal Information. CopyRight © 2002, Elio Ohep.- All rights reserved

This site is a public free site and it contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of business, environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have chosen to view the included information for research, information, and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission fromPetroleumworld or the copyright owner of the material.