Very usefull links


News links




Dow Jones

Oil price



Views and News






U. S. EPA shakes up science panel that guides pollution rules

luke sharrett / bloomberg

- EPA Acting Administrator Andrew Wheeler announced “highly qualified.” five new members

- They are not active researchers and scientists in the field - Andrew Rosenberg, director of the Union of Concerned Scientists' Center for Science and Democracy.

By Jennifer A Dlouhy

Petroleumworld 10 11 2018

The Environmental Protection Agency has installed new members on a scientific advisory panel that guides the agency on air pollution -- and only one of them is an independent, academic scientist.

The seven-member Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee plays a critical role in guiding the EPA's decisions on national standards for ozone, particulate matter and other pollutants. Its responsible for reviewing studies governing air pollution and recommending whether existing national standards need to be rewritten.

EPA Acting Administrator Andrew Wheeler announced five new members on Wednesday, calling them “highly qualified.” In a statement, he cited their diverse “backgrounds in fields like toxicology, engineering, medicine, ecology and atmospheric science.”

But environmentalists raised concerns with the makeup of the panel. Most of the members now hail from state agencies that have been critical of stringent national ambient air quality standards for ozone and other material.

“These are folks who are not active researchers and scientists in the field; these are people who work in state agencies,” said Andrew Rosenberg, director of the Union of Concerned Scientists' Center for Science and Democracy. With the appointments, President Donald Trump's EPA is “stacking the boards” and “fixing the science advisory boards so you really only get one point of view,” Rosenberg said.

The shift comes as the Trump administration remakes other expert advisory panels. Last year, EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt, Wheeler's predecessor, imposed a policy barring committee members from also receiving agency grants -- a change that could limit conflicts of interest but also makes it harder for some academic scientists to participate.

The lone academic scientist in the group is pulmonologist Mark Frampton, a professor emeritus of medicine at the University of Rochester Medical Center , who has published research on ozone air pollution limits.

Other new members include Corey Masuca, with the Jefferson County (Alabama) Department of Health and Steven Packham with Utah's Department of Environmental Quality, and Timothy Lewis, an aquatic ecology expert with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, a federal agency involved in dams, canals and other public works projects.

Another new appointee, toxicologist Sabine Lange with the Texas Council on Environmental Quality, has drawn scrutiny for a workshop on ozone three years ago that critics said downplayed the public health risks. The Environmental Defense Fund said the event undermined the public health benefits of ozone limits and Lange left out key factors in an analysis of ozone exposure.

In May, the EPA imposed new procedures for evaluating national ambient air quality standards, saying the agency should factor in economic concerns.

— With assistance by Ari Natter, and Eric Roston


Story by Jennifer A Dlouhy from Bloomberg News. 10 10 2018


We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Write to

By using this link, you agree to allow PW
to publish your comments on our letters page.

Any question or suggestions,
please write to:

Best Viewed with IE 5.01+ Windows NT 4.0, '95, '98,ME,XP, Vista, Windows 7,8,10 +/ 800x600 pixels

Twitter: @petroleumworld1

November 13 - 15, 2018.

Gubkin University, Moscow
SPE Student Chapter




Editor & Publisher:Elio Ohep/
Contact Email:

CopyRight © 1999-2016, Paul Ohep F. - All Rights Reserved. Legal Information

PW in Top 100 Energy Sites

CopyRight©1999-2017, Petroleumworld ™  / Elio Ohep - All rights reservedThis site is a public free site and it contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of business, environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have chosen to view the included information for research, information, and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission fromPetroleumworld or the copyright owner of the material.