Hal Brands/ Bloomberg:Big Winners
of the Shutdown: China and Russia
U.S. rivals are still open.
A symbolic boon for authoritarianism in its battle against liberal democracy.
As the partial government shutdown drags on, the political cost is mounting for the White House, and the domestic consequences — from uninspected food to long airport security lines — are accumulating. There is also a widely overlooked problem: The shutdown is taking a toll on U.S. foreign policy.
With global concerns about the stability of the U.S. government rising and liberal democracy being challenged by capitalist authoritarianism, the shutdown is one more sign of a political dysfunction that America can little afford.
It's true that compared to previous shutdowns, this one is having relatively few day-to-day effects on American statecraft. In 2013, President Obama canceled a key diplomatic trip to the Asia-Pacific because of the Obamacare shutdown, leading to worries that the U.S. was forfeiting its leadership in the region. This time around, most of the major departments and agencies that make up the national security establishment — particularly the Pentagon and the intelligence community — had already received their full budgets for the fiscal year and have kept operating with minimal or no disruption.
The State Department has been significantly affected : 42 percent of domestic employees and 26 percent of those stationed abroad are furloughed. Others — presumably including those who staffed Secretary of State Mike Pompeo's recent trip to the Middle East — are working without pay. It was already a time of low morale at the department, and this hardly helps. Still, the major muscle movements of U.S. diplomacy have not yet been disrupted — any more than has become the norm during the Trump era, at least.
So where is the foreign policy damage? In the realm of symbolism, because this breakdown of American governance is occurring in two contexts that give it global significance.
The first is surging international concern about the stability and basic functionality of the U.S. government. Countries around the world are always trying to measure those qualities, because international peace and security depend on them. Yet American political dysfunction has been on the rise for decades, and over the past two years in particular, the world has witnessed an alarmingly erratic turn in U.S. policy.
A president who threatens war by tweet and reverses policy on a dime, unprecedented turnover among top foreign policy advisers, and alarmingly high levels of infighting and leaking are standard in the Trump administration. In recent weeks, there have been dueling statements about whether and how the U.S. is withdrawing from Syria, and dueling indications from the president about whether Washington will hand the counter-ISIS fight over to Turkey or devastate that country's economy. Amid all this came the resignation of James Mattis, the secretary of defense in whom many U.S. allies and partners placed so much confidence.
The longest shutdown in U.S. history, triggered by the whim of a president increasingly captive to the most radical parts of his base, can only worsen the growing doubts among allies and friends about whether America can still be counted upon.
Then there is the second context: the intensifying “contest of systems” between liberal democracy and capitalist authoritarianism. The U.S. rivalries with Russia and especially China are not just about military power and diplomatic influence. They are about which system of government can best meet the needs of its people and operate effectively on the global stage. America's competitors have been quite explicit about this. In 2017, President Xi Jinping advertised China's system — which blends a partially free market with authoritarian political control — as “a new option for other countries and nations” around the world.
The U.S. has some inherent advantages in this contest, especially that its political system is far more open, inclusive and transparent. Yet authoritarian leaders often argue that liberal democracies are chaotic, undependable and prone to failure — precisely the message that the shutdown sends. While China is pursuing a trillion-dollar geo-economic project in the Belt and Road initiative, and Russia is re-emerging as the key player in the Middle East, the U.S. cannot even keep its government open.
The Trump administration has promised to make America respected again; it has touted its willingness to engage in great-power competition. It might start by realizing the damage — symbolic but real — this shutdown has caused.
We invite you to join us as a sponsor.
Circulated Videos, Articles, Opinions and Reports which carry your name and brand are used to target Entrepreneurs through our site, promoting your organization’s services. The opportunity is to insert in our stories pages short attention-grabbing videos, or to publish your own feature stories.
Editor's Note: This article was originally published by Bloomberg, on Jan. 16, 2019. Petroleumworld reprint this article in the interest of our readers. All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of Petroleumworld.
Use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
Hit your target - Advertise with us
PW 300.000 plus request per week
All works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
Petroleumworld has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by the originator. Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated. Petroleumworld Copyright© 1999-2018 Petroleumworld or respective author or news agency. All rights reserved.
We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other stories you have to get authorization by its authors. Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated.
Petroleumworld welcomes your feedback and comments, share your thoughts on this article, your feedback is important to us!
Petroleumworld News 01 /18 /2019
We invite all our readers to share with us
their views and comments about this article.
Send this story to a friend
Write to firstname.lastname@example.org
By using this link, you agree to allow PW
to publish your comments on our letters page.
Any question or suggestions,
please write to: email@example.com
Best Viewed with IE 5.01+ Windows NT 4.0, '95,
'98,ME,XP, Vista, Windows 7,8 +/ 800x600 pixels