Ramesh Ponnuru / Bloomberg:Forget About
Trump's New Immigration Position. He Will.
What was that again?
The one thing that's certain about his embrace of legal immigrants
in the State of the Union is that he won't follow through on it.
An ad-libbed moment in President Donald Trump's latest State of the Union address is the key to interpreting it.
“I want people to come into our country in the largest numbers ever, but they have to come in legally,” Trump said. The words “in the largest numbers ever” did not appear in the prepared version of the remarks.
They are also a poor fit for the Trump administration's record. In 2017, Trump endorsed the RAISE Act, a bill that would sharply reduce legal immigration. As the White House put it, “The RAISE Act reduces overall immigration numbers to limit low-skilled and unskilled labor entering the United States.”
When senators offered legislation in 2018 to provide $25 billion for border security in return for permanent legal status for illegal immigrants who came to our country as minors, Trump said he would veto it in large part because the legislation did not include the cuts in legal immigration he wanted.
There's a case for Trump's 2017-18 position that legal immigration levels should be cut. There's a case for his position last night that the levels should be raised. Obviously you can't take both views simultaneously. Perhaps the way to make sense of his shift from the first to the second is to assume that Trump has decided to give up on cutting legal immigration in order to achieve his more important goal of sealing the southern border — that he is tacitly admitting that his previous stance was a tactical mistake.
But there's another way to explain the shift, and I think there's more evidence for it: Trump wasn't serious about either position. Trump did almost nothing to win support for the legal-immigration cuts. When 14 Republican senators joined almost all Democrats to vote against those cuts, he didn't even tweet about it. He hasn't returned to the topic of cutting legal immigration since then.
We are used to presidents who have legislative priorities, stick to them and make deals with congressmen to advance them. President Trump is either unwilling or unable to do much of this work, even on his signature issue of immigration control. His copious day-to-day commentary is often disconnected from that work.
A few days after losing the immigration vote, for example, he told a group of lawmakers that he favored taking guns away from the mentally ill before going to court, raising the age for buying rifles and taking on the National Rifle Association. He never followed through on any of it. Nobody really expected anything else: His own aides largely ignored his comments.
Over the last two months, the president has said that the southern border is already secure , that he would shut down the government to get a wall on that secure border, that actually the Democrats had shut down the government, and that he is considering declaring a national emergency in the name of a wall that he assures us is being built . There was no master strategy behind all of these remarks, just a president who says things serially without caring whether they cohere.
In the hours before the State of the Union speech, aides explained that Trump would emphasize the theme of unity and plug bipartisan initiatives, and so he did. It would not be a bad strategy for him to follow. But those themes don't line up with how Trump has behaved in the past and are unlikely to govern how he or his aides will act after, at most, a few days. Sticking to plans, even flexible ones, has not been a hallmark of this presidency. It's not a presidency that places a lot of weight on the president's words, either.
Whether you loved the speech or hated it, it's not going to set the agenda for Washington this year, or for the administration, or even for Trump himself. Immigration enthusiasts shouldn't take heart, and restrictionists shouldn't despair, about Trump's comment about welcoming record levels of immigration. He may have forgotten he said it already.
We invite you to join us as a sponsor.
Circulated Videos, Articles, Opinions and Reports which carry your name and brand are used to target Entrepreneurs through our site, promoting your organization’s services. The opportunity is to insert in our stories pages short attention-grabbing videos, or to publish your own feature stories.
Ramesh Ponnuru is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. He is a senior editor at National Review, visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and contributor to CBS News. r. Petroleumworld does not necessarily share these views.
Editor's Note: This article was originally published by Bloomberg, on Feb.06, 2019. Petroleumworld reprint this article in the interest of our readers. All comments posted and published on Petroleumworld, do not reflect either for or against the opinion expressed in the comment as an endorsement of Petroleumworld.
Use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of environmental and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
Hit your target - Advertise with us
PW 300.000 plus request per week
All works published by Petroleumworld are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
Petroleumworld has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Petroleumworld endorsed or sponsored by the originator. Petroleumworld encourages persons to reproduce, reprint, or broadcast Petroleumworld articles provided that any such reproduction identify the original source, http://www.petroleumworld.com or else and it is done within the fair use as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated. Petroleumworld Copyright© 1999-2018 Petroleumworld or respective author or news agency. All rights reserved.
We welcome the use of Petroleumworld™ stories by anyone provided it mentions Petroleumworld.com as the source. Other stories you have to get authorization by its authors. Internet web links to http://www.petroleumworld.com are appreciated.
Petroleumworld welcomes your feedback and comments, share your thoughts on this article, your feedback is important to us!
Petroleumworld News 02 /07 /2019
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
By using this link, you agree to allow PW
to publish your comments on our letters page.
Any question or suggestions,
please write to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Best Viewed with IE 5.01+ Windows NT 4.0, '95,
'98,ME,XP, Vista, Windows 7,8 +/ 800x600 pixels